Sunday, November 27, 2016

Reclaiming Beauty

I'm in the process of finding information about me (!) on the internet. No, it isn't some narcissistic activity. There is a purpose to this...

Here is what I found from the erudite, calmly informative (I could learn from that!) Tiberge at Gallia Watch, who kindly introduced my new blog when I started it back in 2013.

I have met Tiberge three times since, where we spent time together in lovely Philadelphia, chatting about blogs, Larry Auster, Laura Wood, beauty, France, and any other topic that took our fancy.

If you are responsive to aesthetics, to beauty, beauty of everything - art, music, architecture, human faces, human shapes, fashion, flowers, manners, voices, and if you feel that today's vulgar and narcissistic counter-culture has arrogantly abandoned the individuality, the inner questioning that are essential for beauty, in favor of insolent, indolent conformity, a conformity that tries to pass itself off as "original" or "creative" or "personal", when in fact it is parasitic, imitative, and repellent - worse, it is deliberately repellent, then you experience, as I do, a vague feeling of nausea in this repellent age we're living in. When a young man, who might have been good-looking in another era, makes your sandwich while you watch in disgust, his arms covered with tattoos, rhinestone earrings clamped on his ears, baggy pants slipping down almost to his thighs; when your waitress, who could be pretty if she valued prettiness, arrives squeezed into a mini skirt, her ears studded with nails, not to mention her nose, and her head shaven to boot, to take your order (as if one could eat after being served by such a creature), then you know you are living in the Age of Repellence. When you are forced to listen to the sounds of someone else's pygmy culture, diligently and diabolically piped through the loud speakers of every store, every coffee shop, every restaurant, every waiting room, everywhere, with no recourse to complain, no power to oppose the shrieking pygmies that rule over us and destroy our peace, then you just stay home.

Remember when a coffee shop conjured up visions of a comfortable chat with friends or a chance to read a good book over a good cup of espresso? Not any more. Starbuck's is torture. Every shop is torture. The sights and sounds are vomitous, repellent, deliberately repellent.

Of course I am speaking of an urban area that is run by "minorities" and elitist leftists. You may see a better side of things where you are.

Kidist Paulos Asrat is the administrator of Reclaiming Beauty, where she analyzes and criticizes the anti-beauty agenda of today's young, (mostly) white women. Of course she denounces the obvious outrages of the type I described above, but she also compares the influential styles of the past with those of today. In a recent post she compared Vogue magazine of the 50's with recent issues. And even more recently she discussed the unfortunate changes made to certain great French perfumes, such as Guerlain's La Petite Robe Noire (The Little Black Dress).

Her insights and opinions won the approval of the late Lawrence Auster who often posted her comments. Recently, Toronto-based Kidist made a trip to New York, with a detour to Springfield, Pennsylvania to visit Lawrence's grave site, where she took several photos. Those of you who followed his blog and his painful last weeks, may find this post of interest.

She is also a great admirer of the New York Public Library, a structure that leaves one breathless, a testimony to the intelligence, taste and vision that prevailed in more civilized times in the United States. And of The Cloisters, in upper Manhattan, a place of rare beauty, another stunning testimony to the American drive for excellence and to the generosity and erudition of men, such as John D. Rockefeller, Jr., often despised for their wealth, yet they poured their money and knowledge into the reconstruction of an extraordinary medieval-style complex of buildings housing priceless treasures, including the Unicorn Tapestries. They did this out of love for art and a desire to educate and elevate the public's understanding. The Cloisters is a branch of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Read more about her Ethiopian origins here, where she provides several links to Lawrence Auster's VFR. I should add that she is fluent in French having studied French in England. (Click her resumé at the top right of her homepage.)

Kidist and I met once, at Lawrence Auster's December dinner in 2011, but we did not really have a chance to speak. I'm very sorry I missed her when she came to Springfield a couple of weeks ago, but she was here and gone so quickly, before I even knew. So hopefully next time…

Top, the "blue hour" in Paris, between day and night. Borrowed from her website.

Below, from the Unicorn Tapestries at The Cloisters.

Michelle Obama: A Candid Conversation With America’s Champion and Mother in Chief

On the eve of her departure from the White House, First Lady Michelle Obama has never been a more inspiring figure—America’s conscience, role model, and mother in chief.

When I arrive at the White House on a hot afternoon in late September to interview Michelle Obama, the place is so eerily quiet I worry for a second that I have come on the wrong day. I have been here every week for a month, sometimes twice a day, to interview people on the First Lady’s staff or to join Mrs. Obama in her motorcade and head out to an event on her schedule. There is usually so much high-stakes, highly choreographed pageantry unfolding that it’s hard to shake the feeling that if you made a move without permission you might get tackled. Indeed, the day I started following Mrs. Obama, I arrived around ten o’clock and had to “hold” in a reception room for ten minutes; then move to a hallway to hold again; then another spot, hold; until at last I was ushered into the Map Room because the First Lady wanted to say hello before we went off to Howard University. Wearing a purple-and-white striped sleeveless Laura Smalls dress, she enveloped me in one of her customary hugs. “I understand you’re going to be with us for a while.” She paused as a look crossed her face, that ornery one she makes when she’s about to deliver a line: “We’re doin’ a deep dive.”

But on this day, a month later: no tours or press conferences, no state dinners or medal ceremonies. Just an enormous, well-appointed mansion, the low fall sun slicing through the cleanest windows in America. Indeed, but for the guards stationed here and there, the place feels entirely empty. Which means that I am (sort of) free to wander around. In the Cross Hall that connects the East Room and the State Dining Room, the mother of all red carpets is rolled up and just sitting there, like it’s about to be hauled away. I bump into Angella Reid, the first (black) woman to serve as chief usher, whom I’d met a couple of years ago when I was here on another assignment. After some inevitable wistfulness about the end of an era, we peek into the Old Family Dining Room, which Mrs. Obama recently redecorated and opened to the public, mostly to catch a glimpse of the mid-sixties painting by Alma Thomas, the first piece of art by a black woman ever displayed in the White House.

RELATED ARTICLES
How Michelle Obama’s Style Has Evolved Over the Past 8 Years
Michelle Obama Has a Goddess Fashion Moment at the State Dinner
It was during that visit two years ago that Joanna Rosholm, Mrs. Obama’s tall, glamorous press secretary, took me on a spin past the First Lady portraits that hang in the Center Hall on the ground floor. We were at a reception, drinks in hand, going from one to the next, when I judged Nancy Reagan’s—purely as a fashion artifact—to be my favorite. Today, with no one around, I feel compelled to take another look. Jackie Kennedy’s has a pastels-in-soft-focus aspect. Hillary Clinton’s portrait looks less like Hillary than Kate McKinnon in a pantsuit doing Hillary. There’s Lady Bird in yellow chiffon; Pat Nixon looking forlorn and trapped; Laura and Barbara Bush, both in somber black. But it is Eleanor Roosevelt’s that really raises an eyebrow. At the bottom of her portrait, her disembodied hands engage in various tasks: knitting, holding a pair of reading glasses, and, inexplicably, fidgeting with her wedding ring, as if she were about to take it off to wash a sinkful of dishes. It is a reminder of just how peculiar the role of First Lady is in American public life. She has a job with no salary, a platform with no power, an East Wing filled with staff but no budget. And it is, as Mrs. Obama will point out to me later, a role that is surprisingly malleable, shaped by the personality, style, and interests (or lack thereof) of the person occupying it. “Everything we do is by choice,” she will tell me. “I could have spent eight years doing anything, and at some level, it would have been fine. I could have focused on flowers. I could have focused on decor. I could have focused on entertainment. Because any First Lady, rightfully, gets to define her role. There’s no legislative authority; you’re not elected. And that’s a wonderful gift of freedom.”

People see themselves in her,” says President Obama. “A dedicated mom, a good friend, and someone who’s not afraid to poke a little fun at herself from time to time
Mrs. Obama took her time. The question she was asked most on the campaign trail was “What kind of First Lady will you be?” The answer was always the same: “I won’t know until I get there.” Early on some critics called her distant or “angry”—an epithet she bristled at. “Michelle never asked to be First Lady,” President Obama writes me by email. “Like a lot of political spouses, the role was thrust upon her. But I always knew she’d be incredible at it, and put her own unique stamp on the job. That’s because who you see is who she is—the brilliant, funny, generous woman who, for whatever reason, agreed to marry me. I think people gravitate to her because they see themselves in her—a dedicated mom, a good friend, and someone who’s not afraid to poke a little fun at herself from time to time.”

Watch “Michelle Obama’s Style Evolution—8 Years in 120 Seconds”:



Once she got her daughters acclimated—she routinely referred to herself as “Mom in chief”—the Harvard-educated lawyer took on issues like support for military families and healthy eating. “It was pooh-poohed as a sort of soft swing at the ball,” she says. By the middle of the second term, she had become more ambitious—launching two education initiatives, Reach Higher and Let Girls Learn—and over the past year and a half finding her métier, turning herself into the First Lady of Popular Culture, mastering social media (thanks to her proximity to a certain couple of teenage girls), appearing as herself on shows like NCIS and Parks and Recreation, singing karaoke with James Corden, and basically charming the pants off of everyone. Somewhere along the way, she became the greatest political communicator of our time—better than Bill Clinton, better than her husband—someone whose speeches actually start national conversations. And throughout all of this, she has remained one of the most glamorous women in the world—admired by teenagers and grandmothers alike—whose daring fashion instincts have won her near-universal accolades from an industry that had a champion in the White House for the first time in decades. When she wore that showstopping Atelier Versace rose-gold chain-mail column to her final state dinner in October, the Internet worked itself into a state of collective mourning over the fact that there will be no more Michelle Obama fashion moments to obsess about.

The White House has changed quite a bit in the past eight years, becoming much warmer, far less formal, and distinctly more diverse. Obamalot, if you will. They have created an ecosystem that is so effortlessly inclusive that, for example, Joe Mahshie, a trip coordinator for the First Lady, and Brian Mosteller, director of Oval Office operations, were married by Joe Biden at his home just a few months ago. Mahshie, my minder today, tells me that he first met Mrs. Obama when his then boyfriend Mosteller took him to join the SoulCycle class that the First Lady goes to once a week with White House staffers. Mahshie and Mrs. Obama struck up a conversation; one of her staffers was taken aback by his forwardness: “Do you know her?” No, we just met, he replied. “Was I not supposed to talk to her? Should I have curtsied?” He laughs. “She creates that possibility.”

In the Blue Room, Cristeta Comerford, the (first woman, first Asian) executive chef, is preparing crudité and hummus with vegetables from Mrs. Obama’s beloved White House garden. (A week from now, Mrs. Obama will hold a press conference on the South Lawn to announce that she has arranged for the National Park Service to care for the garden when she is gone and has raised $2.5 million of private funding to cover the costs. Word to future presidents: Don’t even think about messin’ with my garden.) Some of her staff have gathered, including chief of staff Tina Tchen and communications director Caroline Adler Morales. We are standing around a table noshing and gossiping about Brad and Angelina when Mrs. Obama finally appears, in a black Versace dress. The first thing she says is “Are you sick of me by now?” (Exactly no one is sick of you by now, I want to say but don’t.) We sit down in facing chairs in front of the curved windows that look out onto the Truman Balcony, and I joke that the unsettling quiet makes it feel like it’s already over. Who’s the president? “Is it January?” she says, laughing. “What did I miss?” Which brings up the fraught question of how she’s feeling with the end now in sight.

The day before, I sat with Valerie Jarrett—senior adviser to the president and one of the Obamas’ closest friends—in her office in the West Wing. She made a crack about her hair going gray (“I earned it. Every one of them”) and then described the waning days of the Obama years as “excruciating.” She paused and added, “For me.” Another pause. “I cry a lot. It takes very little to set me off.” Just that past Saturday, at the opening of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, she had come unglued during President Obama’s remarks. “He decides to ad lib at the very end of his speech about what it would be like to come back to the museum when Sasha and Malia have children of their own, and he describes holding this little hand and walking through this arc of history, and I looked at the First Lady and she’s crying. I’m sitting next to [White House chief of staff] Denis McDonough, and he’s crying. Tina Tchen is crying. Everybody’s crying! I think we’re all acutely aware that this chapter of their lives is coming to an end. Fortunately they’re young enough to have an extraordinary next chapter, but this is unique, and it’s almost over.”

When I bring this up to Mrs. Obama, she lets out a big sigh. “You know, there are little . . . moments. Even today I was looking out at this view here.” She gestures to the windows. “Looking out on the South Lawn and the Washington Monument and it had just rained and the grass was really green and everything popped a little bit more. It’s soooo beautiful. And for that moment I thought, I’m going to miss waking up to this, having access to this anytime I want.” She recrosses her legs. “But on the flip side . . . it’s time. I think our democracy has it exactly right: two terms, eight years. It’s enough. Because it’s important to have one foot in reality when you have access to this kind of power. The nature of living in the White House is isolating. And I think Barack and I—because we’re kind of stubborn—we’ve maintained some normalcy, mostly because of the age of our kids. I go out to dinner with my girlfriends; I go to Sasha’s games; Barack has coached a little basketball with Sasha’s team. But at the same time, when you can’t walk into CVS?”

There is a CVS a block away from here, I say. “I know,” she says with a look of comic weariness. “But I always think, Fun for me! But a complete hassle for my Secret Service agents.” She pauses. “When you’re not engaged in the day-to-day struggles that everybody feels, you slowly start losing touch. And I think it’s important for the people in the White House to have a finger on the pulse.”

I think our democracy has it exactly right: two terms, eight years,” says Mrs. Obama. “It’s enough. Because it’s important to have one foot in reality when you have access to this kind of power
One of the ways that Michelle Obama has kept her finger on the pulse—and one foot in reality—is by spending a lot of time around young people, usually students, mostly in private and off the record. Shortly after she got to the White House, she launched a mentoring program for disadvantaged girls, which in practical terms means that she has been meeting with two dozen high school juniors and seniors at the White House, sometimes once a month, every year since 2009. “I spend meaningful time with these girls,” she tells me. You can see on her face and hear in her voice that this is where Mrs. Obama’s heart lies—and it’s one indication of how she might occupy herself post–White House. Eric Waldo, the executive director of the First Lady’s Reach Higher project (which aims to encourage all American students to educate themselves past high school), calls his boss “the school counselor in chief for the country” and tells me that the foundational reason she made education a priority is that she had a “bad experience in high school. A counselor told her, ‘I’m not sure if you’re Princeton material.’ And when she got to Princeton, she felt lost.” She tells this story to kids in private, says Waldo, “and they have these same doubts, and you see it happen, where suddenly she’s just, like, a person.”

Mrs. Obama also likes to go to where students are—to high schools and campuses—to surprise them. One morning in early September—a morning when there’s a headline on the front page of every paper about Georgetown University’s decision to offer admission preference to the descendants of slaves—her motorcade pulls out of the South Gate and zips unimpeded across town to Howard University, Seth Meyers and his Late Night production crew in tow.

At one point, Meyers is sitting onstage in an auditorium filled with about 300 students, mostly freshmen, who think they’re here for a taped interview with America’s Got Talent host Nick Cannon, who also happens to be a 36-year-old freshman at Howard. But Cannon is a decoy, and when the First Lady walks out from behind the curtain, all the students shoot straight up out of their seats as if jolted by an electrical shock, and the cheering and shrieking and crying, sustained for a full minute, is like no other sound I’ve heard. If you want to understand exactly what Michelle Obama means to black teenagers, listen to that sound. “I don’t usually get standing ovations like that,” says Meyers. “Thank you.”

Kids are watching us,” she says. “I experience it every single day. They hang on my every word, what I wear, what I say. They are writing papers about us. They come to us and they’re like, ‘I dressed like you for Halloween’
But when everyone settles down and students are given a chance to ask Mrs. Obama questions, a surprising theme emerges. Most of us are now familiar with her story: born and raised in a blue-collar family on the South Side of Chicago, endured an hour-and-a-half commute to attend the city’s first magnet high school, worked several jobs and borrowed a lot of money to get herself through Princeton, then Harvard Law. But what I didn’t know was how tentative and insecure she was in the beginning. A young man from Macon, Georgia, stands up and asks if there’s anything she would have changed about her freshman year. “I probably would have tried more things. . . . You all should not be spending time alone in your rooms unless you’re studying. And when you’re not, get out there. Meet people, introduce yourself. Just assume that everyone wants to know you. OK?” A moment later, someone asks what her freshman year taught her about herself. She recounts the story about being told that Princeton “was reaching too high. That the schools I was applying to were too . . . much for me.” You can still hear the disgust in her voice all these years later. “And then I got there and I looked around and thought: I’m just as smart as these people! What were they thinkin’? So there are a lot of people who will try to step on your confidence based on their assumptions about who they think you are.” A murmur of recognition ripples through the audience. “For all of you sitting here, with those doubts in your head—because those whispers of doubt, they stay with you for a very long time—ignore them. . . . I still carry that with me today, as First Lady of the United States, because there are people who don’t think I should be doing that either.”

I made such a visceral connection to the things she told the students at Howard that I say to her one day at the White House, “Turns out we have a lot in common.” She stares at me for a second, then gets that look on her face. “You’re a black girl from the South Side of Chicago?” We both crack up; her staff falls into hysterics. She asks me about my background (blue-collar family: mailman dad, bus-driver mom), and she says, “You and I know, there was no magic. I’m sure you didn’t have people following you around begging you to apply to their colleges. I want kids to know: Don’t wait for somebody to come along and tell you you’re special. Because that may never happen.

“Kids are watching us,” she continues. “I experience it every single day. They hang on my every word, what I wear, what I say. And it’s not just kids at Howard; it’s not just African-American kids. They are writing papers about us. They come to us and they’re like, ‘I dressed like you for Halloween.’” I let out a nervous chuckle, and she shoots me a look that says, True story. “Little blonde white girl. I’m like, ‘Really, sweetie?’ And she said, ‘Yes! And I looked just like you!’ And I’m like, ‘Of course you did! And you did such a great job!’” We pause to laugh and ponder this for a moment. “But that means something to me. Maybe because I still have kids and I know that they’re influenced by people they look up to, but it makes us want to live right and do right and be right—Every. Single. Day—so that we don’t ever disappoint these kids and they have something to hold on to, and so that they know—as I say all the time—I can do this. You can do this.”

Earlier in the day, Mrs. Obama ambushed four freshmen in one-on-one encounters in a classroom with Seth Meyers’s cameras rolling. I sat behind the cameramen with Tina Tchen and took it all in, in a state of bemused amazement. Here was the First Lady of the United States of America, hiding behind a curtain while two dozen people—White House staffers, talk-show producers—waited in silence for the unsuspecting eighteen-year-olds to enter and get . . . Punk’d, essentially. Surprise! “All of our elaborate ruses,” said Tchen with a weary laugh. Three of the four students buckled and stammered in a state of overwrought disbelief; a student named Trey, both laughing and crying, said, “You can’t do this to people.” Mrs. Obama hugged him for longer than usual and said, “We know this is a shock to the system.” But there was one girl who appeared entirely immune to this friendly scheme. Seemingly unimpressed and unsurprised, she asked a question about partying and then clicked off on her heels. Toodle-oo! Her detachment felt like a sharp little rebuke, a reminder that not everyone wants to be—or can be—touched by the strange magic of Michelle Obama in the prime of her gift.

Apparently it goes both ways. Just before we leave Howard, the First Lady does an interview with Lilly Singh, a 28-year-old YouTube star with nearly ten million subscribers, whose brand is all about girl power—or, as it were, Girl Love. Mrs. Obama initially seems on guard: subdued, less expansive than usual. “Be, like, funky!” Singh says to her before they start. “I’ll do a little bit of an intro, be all excited, you know, ‘Wassup?!’” As the cameras are ready to roll, Singh leans into her guest and yells, “Chillin’ with FLOTUS! No big deal!” And then this: “FLOTUS is like, ‘Girl, you trippin’!’” Mrs. Obama gamely soldiers on through the segment, which ends with Singh holding up pictures of people the First Lady knows and asking her to “compliment” them. “Whatever you like,” she says. “I just want to know what lives in your heart.” One of the photos is of Jill Biden, and Mrs. Obama rattles off a list: “Dear friend, partner, blue-star mom, kind, curious, smart, professional.” There are more photos, more compliments, and then Singh holds up a picture of herself. The First Lady proceeds with caution. “Beautiful. Smart. Entrepreneurial. Funny,” says Mrs. Obama. “Uhhhh. . . .” She pauses for a moment and then puts a little something extra on the next compliment. “Loud.”

Over a five-day stretch, I watch Mrs. Obama appear on three different stages, in three knockout dresses, in front of three entirely different kinds of audiences to speak about three unrelated things, and each time she takes the room’s breath away. First, because of how tall and otherworldly she can seem from a distance, but also because of how bold she can be—how confident in her ability to speak forcefully and intimately at once.

She has this extraordinary ability to meet people where they are,” says Valerie Jarrett. “And I think that’s hard to do from the lofty perch of the White House. But she has never climbed up on the perch!
One of the events is a conversation with former First Lady Laura Bush, on the subject of the military as seen from their particular vantage points. Taking in the two women side by side puts a fine point on just how modern Mrs. Obama is, in her blue-and-white, floral-print Michael Kors dress with its ironic, exaggerated fifties silhouette—while Mrs. Bush looks conservative in a lime-green dress, set hair, kitten heels, and string of pearls. Bob Woodruff, the moderator, asks if they could each speak to what it’s like to live in the White House with a war going on. Mrs. Bush talks about being fearful for troops in harm’s way. “You’re in the lap of luxury, really—beautiful house where your sheets are changed every single day . . . and our troops are lying out on the ground somewhere. . . . You worry about them all the time, every single day.” And Mrs. Obama says this: “When we first came into office, the first term, our visits [to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center] would last for hours because there would be 25, 50, 75 folks that we would be seeing, going from room to room, many with devastating injuries. And now, today, just last week, Barack went to visit and he was there for 30 minutes because there are fewer of our men and women who are being injured in war. And that feels good. That’s something that a commander in chief thinks about before they pop off about going to war. Because when you’ve spent time on a base, and you know these men and women . . . you don’t just talk about war like there are no implications. It’s serious business. And lives are changed forever.”

Her skill at speaking in public is something to behold. Think of the most enduring line from the, um, deplorable election cycle we were all just put through: When they go low, we go high. Mrs. Obama’s family motto was part of her jaw-dropping speech at the Democratic National Convention in late July, and it remained a topic of conversation for weeks. Hillary Clinton herself, during the second debate, answered the fusillade of gutter lies from Donald Trump by invoking it. For the record, Mrs. Obama claims she did not watch the debates. “I can’t. That’s part of staying hopeful and positive—be able to go high. . . . Sometimes that means just not engaging. And that’s not just with these debates. If I didn’t have to be at my husband’s debates, I wouldn’t have watched those, either.”

But it became clear after watching another speech, Mrs. Obama addressing a Clinton rally in New Hampshire in mid-October—her voice shaking with indignation at the sexual predation of Trump—that she must have reengaged at some point. It was the best, most overtly political speech of her life, a smart bomb that hit its target dead center. Midway through, a woman shouted, “Preach it, First Lady!” And then a minute later, a man bellowed, “We’re with you!,” making overt the awkward fact that Mrs. Obama has that thing—that emotional connection, that relatable empathy—that Clinton seemed somehow to lack over the past year. An unscientific scroll-poll through the comments about the speech on YouTube shows that . . . oh, let’s just take a stab and say five out of ten people wish she would run for president.

Ain’t gonna happen. “Absolutely not,” says Valerie Jarrett. I tell her that there are people who will insist that those speeches are setting her up for a run. Jarrett argues exactly the opposite: The speeches connect precisely because she’s not a politician and never will be. “Nobody questions her motives,” she says. “Everybody knows exactly why she’s doing what she’s doing. There are no hidden agendas. She’s pure in mission, honest, kind, empathetic.” She adds, “She has this extraordinary ability to meet people where they are. And I think that’s hard to do from the lofty perch of the White House. But she has never climbed up on the perch! I’ve never met anybody with quite that gift before.”

Mrs. Obama, as everyone now knows, was a political spouse who did not love campaigning and was very careful about how and when she participated in the process. Melissa Winter, the First Lady’s deputy chief of staff, the only person on her team who has been on board from the beginning, remembers Mrs. Obama’s evolution during that 2008 campaign: first living rooms in Iowa and New Hampshire “with eighteen people sitting cross-legged on the floor.” Then backyards, then community centers, then gymnasiums. As the crowds grew, so did Mrs. Obama’s confidence. “The moment when I realized she’s bigger than all of us,” says Winter, “is when we were at the convention in Denver and she gave that really pivotal speech where she introduced herself to the country and she introduced her husband. That was when I realized this woman has such a presence and she has such a grace about her. The only thing practiced about her was how hard she worked on her speech.” When I was in the First Lady’s office one morning, I could not help noticing that a teleprompter was set up in the corner for rehearsal sessions. “She really pours herself into them,” says Winter. “I think she enjoys it now.”

I will take the same approach leaving as I did coming in. I won’t know until I’m there. I’ve never been the former First Lady of the United States of America before
The most demanding part of being First Lady, it turns out, is emotional. “I have to be in tune,” says Mrs. Obama. “All the time. I have to be in tune with my husband, where he is, how he’s feeling. I have to be in tune with where my family is. The same thing is true in the work that I do. It’s all about me feeling where people are. So that’s why I try to be really present, even when I’m on a rope line. I never take for granted my interactions with people. And it’s never black-and-white. I’m usually reading the crowd, reading the people that I’m with. I guess if this role has changed me, it’s improved my ability to do that. I’ve gotten better at sensing where people are at any given time.”

It’s a Monday afternoon in mid-September, and the First Lady, wearing dark greenish-gray jeans, Converse low-tops, and a Raquel Allegra top, is rehearsing a bit with Ellen DeGeneres before cohosting a full hour of her talk show. “Here are some tough issues facing the country today,” says Ellen. “I want to get the White House’s official position on these.” She then brings up a series of the least pressing issues imaginable. “Is it pop or soda?” “Toilet paper: Under or over?” But when she gets to “Twizzlers or Red Vines?” Mrs. Obama reveals a little something about her highly controlled life. “I know what a Twizzler is,” the First Lady says, “but what’s a Red Vine?” There’s some back-and-forth about what distinguishes the two red licorices, and then Mrs. Obama says to Ellen, “You don’t know what they are. We need clarity!” Finally she chooses Twizzlers but then looks over at Tina Tchen, who is seated in the front row. “Unless politically I shouldn’t. . . .” Both are correct, says Tina, playing along. “My people will decide which one I prefer,” Mrs. Obama says. Everyone cracks up. “That is my life!”

Between takes, Ellen blasts her favorite songs, mostly seventies R&B, soul, and funk—and Mrs. Obama seems to know the lyrics to every one, singing along to herself with her eyes closed while someone touches up her makeup or a techie fusses over her mic. At one point, she and Ellen sing the Salt-N-Pepa song “Shoop” to each other, a tune with complex wordplay that is more than a little racy. Music, Mrs. Obama tells me, “is my best de-stresser in life. The times when Barack and I are at our most relaxed are when we invite some friends over who we have known forever. And you put a little music on top of that? Some good food? It renews your spirit to get back in the game.”

The taping is a huge success, and Ellen seems to be only half kidding afterward when she tries to get Mrs. Obama to sign a “contract” saying that “if you ever decide to do a talk show, you will do it with me.” Mrs. Obama looks at the “contract” and says, “What’s all this? This is not even real.” She pauses like a pro to let the audience laugh. “I am a lawyer!” Later I ask the First Lady if she did any acting as a kid. “Gosh. I don’t know. I think back to the little . . . it was called the Operetta Workshop, in the basement of the Woodlawn AME Church, where we would put on plays, put on operas. We did some plays in a school auditorium until maybe I was eight years old. But let me just say this: That was the extent of my . . . theatrical training.” She laughs. “You know, it’s the silliness in me. It has always been there. I love to make people laugh. It comes from my family. My family is funny. People sit around and play the dozens. My father—he was a storyteller. If you met any of my uncles, my cousins, everybody’s a ham and can talk for hours, everybody’s got a little sarcasm, they’ve got a little edge.”

She has that edge. She is skilled at the good-natured put-down, and she likes to tease people, not least of all her husband. I had also heard from someone that you might not want to get into an argument with her. When I bring this up to Valerie Jarrett, she looks at me over the top of her glasses and says, “It’s hard work. I’ve tried it.” Mrs. Obama sheepishly concedes, “It’s a tough place, our household. We’re pretty competitive, We’re all opinionated. I’m talking from Grandma on down, so, yeah, if that’s not in your personality, I can be a bit much. Because I get worked up about stuff. I can kinda go: And then. And another thing. Sometimes my team is like, ‘OK, reel that back in and settle down.’ But when I get on a point—‘Well, why are we doing this?’—I will beat a dead horse. They’re like: ‘OK! We get it. You don’t want to do it!’ ” She lets out a big, deep chuckle. “’Nuff said.”

White House protocol dictates where the portraits of the First Ladies hang. The most recent former First Lady gets pride of place, at the east end of the Ground Floor Corridor. So when Michelle Obama’s portrait earns that spot sometime next year, all of the others will be moved one space to the west. Presumably, should Hillary prevail (this story went to press just prior to the election), Bill Clinton’s portraits will eventually hang in the White House in two places: upstairs on the State Floor, as president, and a new one that will replace Mrs. Obama’s, which will move down the line, further into history. And who will Michelle Obama be then?

“I will take the same approach leaving as I did coming in,” she says. “I won’t know until I’m there. I’ve never been the former First Lady of the United States of America before.” She thinks for a moment. “But I will always be engaged in some way in public service and public life. The minute I left my corporate-law firm to work for the city, I never looked back. I’ve always felt very alive using my gifts and talents to help other people. I sleep better at night. I’m happier. So we’ll look at the issues that I’ve been working on. The question is: How do I engage in those issues from a new platform? I can’t say right now, because we can’t spend that much time really doing the hard work of vetting offers or ideas or options because we’re still closing things out here.” She laughs. “We’re still in full implement mode. Doesn’t it feel that way? You’ve been with me for a month. Don’t feel like anyone’s lettin’ me slow down.”

One of the more tantalizing things about the Obamas’ immediate future is that they are going to live in Washington, D.C., until Sasha finishes high school in a couple of years. Jarrett is going to “stick around for a bit,” too, she says. “My daughter just moved here.” She points out that Mrs. Obama already has “a life outside this bubble. She has developed really good friendships with people in D.C. who have nothing to do with the administration. It’s harder for [the president] to do that. But I think that what works about them is that wherever they are, they figure it out. And they make it good and they make it fun and they make it make sense. I do think that whoever the president’s successor is, they need not worry about having a second president in Washington. I think that they take it from President George W. Bush’s playbook in that you’ve had your time and it’s up. So you’re not going to see her on MSNBC as a commentator. That I can assure you.”

As our interview in the Blue Room slips past the hour mark, I tell Mrs. Obama that she has been described as both brave and cautious. Are they mutually exclusive? “I would say I’m strategic. I really do think that’s the word. If I push back against something that somebody asked me to do, it’s less out of caution and more out of ‘What are we doing this for? Is this a good use of my time?’”

I mention that Jarrett described her fashion choices as brave. A deeply skeptical look furrows her brow. “Yeah, no . . . I don’t think about it like that. It all boils down to comfort level: If I’m going to make you comfortable, then I have to be comfortable first. So my first reaction isn’t ‘Who made this?’ But ‘Let’s try it on. What does it look like? Oooh, that’s cute. Oh, wow. I never thought of wearing something like this. Let’s put a belt on it. I feel gooood in this.’ There are definitely designers that I love, people I love to work with. And who they are as people matters. Are they good people? Do they treat their staff well? Do they treat my staff well? Are they young? Can I give them a boost? But! When all of that is equal . . . is it cute?!”

That Gucci map dress you wore on Ellen sure looked good, I say.

“Well, that was a cute dress!” she says. “That’s how I felt in it! I put it on and I thought, This is so cute!” A few moments later, we stand up and a photographer appears to take our picture. Do we look cute? I ask, and the First Lady says, “Well, I know I look cute because this dress is smokin’!” She hugs me not once but three times, and it reminds me of something she said about advice she gave those students at Howard: Have fun, make friends, play music, and have a party in your dorm room. Don’t take it all so seriously.

“I always touch people,” she says, “because I know that there’s a level of anxiety, people are teary or they’re nervous, and I just try to physically hold them and bring them down and say: ‘We’re here. I’m just Michelle.’ I want them to be able to walk away from that moment feeling like it meant something to them. And if they’re too nervous, if it feels too . . . formal, people can’t breathe.” She pauses for moment. “So that’s what I try to do with my interactions: a hug, a touch. It’s like music. It’s like friendship.”

Get the December issue on Amazon today.

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Thanksgiving Wishes to my American Friends

From a Reclaiming Beauty Post in 2014:


Norman Rockwell (1894-1978)
Freedom From Want
1943


Happy Thanksgiving!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are Thanksgiving wishes from my two favorite American posters:

From Laura Wood's The Thinking Housewife:

Unity, Not Division


Fruit in a Basket, James Peale

THANKSGIVING is a day for unity, not division. What are the things that unite us, whatever our political persuasions? The conditions of existence unite us. Here are three:
1. We were born; created, not self-begotten.

2. We will die.

3. Our souls will live forever.
None of us differ in any of these conditions. The innate longing for unity is fulfilled. We are on the same boat. We are in the same vessel. We sail on the sea of time. We will sail on the sea of eternity.

The immortality of the soul can be established with the use of simple logic. You don’t have to get a degree in philosophy to see it. The soul is immaterial. It is not physical. It does not partake of physical death.

Put away political thoughts. They will be there when you wake up tomorrow. Put away political knives. Cut the turkey instead. We are alike more than we are different. Gratitude is a universal need.

We have such a beautiful country, which none of us deserve. We can be united in gratitude that we are so much united. We can be united as the collective recipients of undeserved gifts.

Let the mountains receive peace for the people: and the hills justice. (Psalm 72:3)

Happy Thanksgiving!

The editorial board and maintenance staff of The Thinking Housewife extends her wish for many blessings to you, whatever your beliefs.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Gallia Watch:

Thanksgiving 2016



Thanks to zazie for the beautiful card. It's a long holiday week-end in America, my favorite holiday, and posting will be a bit slow. While we have much to be thankful for this year, the suddenness with which the situation changed leaves me breathless, wondering "What next?" Events that seemed not only unlikely but frankly out of the question are happening both in America and France. Amazing how the two countries are influenced by each other. Now I wonder who will be ambassador to France.

Below, a short passage from The Heritage Foundation, on the proclamation of Thanksgiving day:

Following a resolution of Congress, President George Washington proclaimed Thursday the 26th of November 1789 a day of “public thanksgiving and prayer” devoted to “the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be.” Reflecting American religious practice, Presidents and Congresses from the beginning of the republic have from time to time designated days of fasting and thanksgiving (the Thanksgiving holiday we continue to celebrate in November was established by Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and made into law by Congress in 1941).

In setting aside a day for Thanksgiving, Washington established a non-sectarian tone for these devotions and stressed political, moral, and intellectual blessings that make self-government possible, in addition to personal and national repentance. Although the First Amendment prevents Congress from establishing a religion or prohibiting its free exercise, Presidents, as well as Congress, have always recognized the American regard for sacred practices and beliefs. Thus, throughout American history, Presidents have offered non-sectarian prayers for the victory of the military and in the wake of catastrophes. Transcending passionate quarrels over the proper role of religion in politics, the Thanksgiving Proclamation reminds us how natural their relationship has been. While church and state are separate, religion and politics, in their American refinement, prop each other up.

The full text of George Washington's October 3, 1789 proclamation is on the same web page (link above).




Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Transforming Society: Art as Proxy

The Art Gallery of Mississauga
Art in Mississauga

Monday, November 21, 2016

Review of "Thanksgiving: The Holiday at the Heart of the American Experience"


Master of the Munich Golden Legend, 1400-1460
The Tower of Babel
Folio 17v from the Bedford Book of Hours.
Illumination (10 in × 7 in), 1415-1430

Genesis 11:1-9
1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.
4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
5 And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
6 And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.
8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
It is fascinating that Melanie Kirkpatrick should start her new book Thanksgiving: The Holiday at the Heart of the American Experience with the chapter headed Newcomers. She writes in the chapter of her visit to Queens, New York to give a presentation on Thanksgiving to sixteen-year-old new immigrants in a public high school especially constructed for "new comers" and aptly called Newcomers High. She could have at least called it "New Americans."

She writes, as though it is a good thing: "If the Tower of Babel had a contemporary earthly home it would be located in the corridors of Newcomers High." Yet this biblical tower, which was intended to reach God, was never completed since he "confound[ed] their language, that they may not understand one another's speech" and thus couldn't communicate with each other. Their lofty and arrogant goal collapsed.

But what is fascinating about Kirkpatrick's account is not this usual glorification of multiculturalism, which all westerners are now doing, but how she rewrites the history of Thanksgiving to fit this multicultural ethos.

Thanksgiving dinner was created out of a specific historical context. The foods describe the original historical event and thus a specific time in American history. Re-structuring the menu changes this history and makes Thanksgiving something else.

Kirkpatrick recounts their Thanksgiving meals students described to her:
There would be non-traditional food on the menu too as their families initiated their own Thanksgiving food traditions by incorporating favorite home-country dishes into the classic American meal.
If Kirkpatrick wants immigrants to contribute their thanks with their own particular histories and backgrounds, then she should advocate for a different holiday: Multicultural Thanks to America perhaps. Changing the foods changes the holiday. Kirkpatrick is not directly (or consciously) advocating for a new Thanksgiving narrative, but in her desire to be "inclusive" she is boldly rewriting American history. A less generous critique would be (given that she is a seasoned researcher and historian) that she is provoding a false version of American history to fit her ideology of inclusiveness.

The rest of the book offers nothing new or no new insights. There is the mandatory chapter on the "tragedy" of the Native Americans, who have wrung the sympathy tears out of contemporary Americans for decades, the same way that blacks have picked at the wounds of slavery even when they now have been infinitely compensated by the collective guilty conscious of whites. In an interesting but long chapter on turkeys, Kirkpatrick appears to refute the historical presence of the bird on Americans' Thanksgiving dinner tables by weaving in substitutes (oysters, geese chicken) but finishes off the chapter by acknowledging the importance of the bird in celebrating the holiday.

She also writes of the generosity of Americans in holding out their hands to the poor. Churches and communities provide food and dinners for the poor to celebrate the holiday, with some collecting their turkey from food banks, and other sitting together at communal tables for a Thanksgiving meal in church basements. Thanksgiving, in the peculiar history of American christianity, is a quintessentially American Christian holiday, coming close to Christmas and Easter. She gives no account of parallel charitable outreaches by those multi-faith, multi-cultural Thanksgiving co-celebrants she writes about.

What could have been an interesting re-counting of the American Thanksgiving story becomes tarnished by its ode to multiculturalism and its attempt to make Thanksgiving, inacurately, into a multicultural event. It might be excusable if Thanksgiving: The Holiday at the Heart of the American Experience were an innocent attempt at inclusveness. But its agenda is bigger than a generous inclusion of all "Americans" and becomes a subtle movement toward changing America instead.

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Psalm 145:17

The Lord is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works.

An Artist in Toronto

An Artist in Toronto

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Green, the Color of the Devil's Flames




Tom Ford's "green" perfumes in the Square One, Mississauga Holts Renfrew entrance
[Photo By: KPA]