Showing posts with label Landscape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Landscape. Show all posts

Monday, January 20, 2020

Double Country

I made it to the Art Gallery of Mississauga on Saturday, ignoring the forecast of a snowstorm. The storm was worse than I had expected, the falling snow was a snow/ice mixture, with a blowing wind that made these pellets feel like mini pine needles.

The AGM hosted its the annual juried show presented by Visual Arts Mississauga the night before. I prefered to see the exhibition at a quieter time, at my own pace. The VAM Facebook page has uploaded photos of the event, including some of the paintings (there were 40 entries).

Here are two that caught my eye in the exhibition, and which I took snapshots of:


Left: Hannah Veiga: You Used to be My Favourite Colour
Right: Stuart Godfrey: 4th Line Backside

Albeit, they are both a little bleak in concept.

Veiga writes on her website that her fabric piece is: "a contemplation of what constitutes a home, and what remains when something loses its meaning of a home." Is is not clear what she means by that. Perhaps her curtains don't have any place to hang, other than in galleries and design shows. Her floral design is a complicated process with seven color scheme (red, light red, green, light green, grey, yellow, white), and its mockup on (Japanese) Kozuke paper - no less! I assume the fabric was printed through the digital fabric printing processes now readily available, probably more so than silkscreen studios. Manual printing, the method I used to print on fabric, prepares each color separately on a silk screen, and in this case, seven separate screens, to produce the whole pattern.

And Godfrey's barn has no front, and the items within it, or surrounding it, look like old fences, sacks and what look like mattresses. But it is still standing, as are many old and non-functional barns throughout the countryside, waiting to be rediscovered, remodeled, and to be put to use again. Godfrey is a talented painter, whose oil panel is meticulously painted, to the last blade of grass.

Both pieces allude to a surer time, when no-one questioned the "favourtism" of a home's choice of colors. When curtains WERE colorful, and the black/white/gray/beige variety that line "designer" stores these days (for color and variety, go to Walmart!) And both have solid structures: the barn still has an upright frame, and all a farmer need do is restore the floors and facade; the pattern promises of a home of florals. And both reference a time in the recent past when we had such things in our landscapes, both internal and external, and lived better lives through them.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Designing a Garden


The Monet Bridge in the Gibbs Gardens


Claude Monet, 1840-1926
Bridge over a Pond of Water Lilies, 1899
Oil on canvas
36 1/2 x 29 in.
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Garden Smart is a show which features gardens and gardeners around the United States. This week, the host of the program, Eric Johnson, went to Georgia, to the Gibbs Gardens in Atlanta, where landscaper architect Jim Gibbs has designed his own home's garden.

Gibbs talks about his initial idea of designing his garden, and how he went about collecting the plants and designing the landscape.

Below is the full (26 minute) video of Garden Smart showcasing the Gibbs Gardens.



This excerpt starts around the 5 minute mark of the video, and ends around the 7 minute mark:
- Johnson: Today we're going to visit your opus, your masterpiece, Gibbs Garden. I can't wait to tour it.

- Gibbs: Thank you, I look forward to showing it to you.

- Johnson: why did you select this site?

- Gibbs: In 1973, I knew that I wanted to build a world class garden. But I knew that first of all, I had to come up with a criteria for searching for and. I knew that I needed an abundance of water. I needed a mature, forest setting. I wanted to make sure that we had rolling topography to feature all the plant material...So I started searching for land in 1980, and I found this beautiful piece of property. There was no question I had all the water that I needed. Hundreds of springs everywhere. And a stream that flowed through the valley. And I would be able to create all of the ponds - there were 32 ponds I wanted to build - the bridge crossings and the waterfalls.

- Johnson: This garden has a very old look about it. And you said you started in 1980, so this is a 33 year-old garden. It looks like it's been here for over a hundred years.

- Gibbs: Most people that come to the Gibbs garden say: "Did you inherit this from your parents?" And of course, if you can find a piece of property as beautiful as this is with all the natural formations that we had, it'd make such a difference, because so many gardens that have been built have started as prairie land and it takes seven years just to make the garden have enough age and maturity.

- Johnson: Sure. Give us a quick overview of the garden.

- Gibbs: We actually have sixteen garden venues. Three of these are feature gardens. And they serve as the three magnets that pull people from one point to the next. And within those three magnets, we've been able to develop the other sixteen garden venues. So when you come to Gibbs Gardens, if you come every three weeks, you're going to see something different in bloom. It was designed that way from the first of March to the middle of December. So we like for people to come and see every bloom festival. And we have a calendar that shows our flower festivals and our music festivals
Jim Gibbs then talks extensively about his daffodils, and later about his flowering trees, and especially on how to prune crepe myrtles.

Below is a map of the garden, showing the Monet bridge, the waterlily garden, and the daffodils which cover a large area of the garden.




Crepe myrtle (also known as crape myrtle) from the Gibbs Gardens,
which are located in northern part of the garden.
Pruning crepe myrtle is not essential, but aesthetically recommended
.

Other interviews of gardeners by Johnson can be viewed here.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saturday, July 27, 2013

To the Waterfront!

A couple of days ago, I walked several blocks down Yonge Street to get to the waterfront, or to Harbourfront, as it is known in Toronto. I took my camera, since it was a beautiful, sunny summer's day, and I was sure I would find somethings to capture along the way.

Here is my route, in pictures:




Black-eyed Susans behind The Royal York Hotel


The Royal York Hotel
Built in 1929 by architects Ross and MacDonald



Detail of the Royal York Hotel facade
On the Front Street entrance
Across from Union Station



Interior of Union Station, archway with lamp


The Guastavino tiles of Union Station's ceiling


Maple Leaf Chair in the Harbourfront Centre


Tugboat on Lake Ontario
I was sitting on a bench in front of the lake, eating a sandwich for lunch, and watching the tugboats on the lake. A large seagull waddled up before me, wanting a share of my vittles. I shooed it away. No effect. It was a bold, and emboldened, creature. I ignored it and the intruder left on its own will.

I continued to watch the tugboats maneuvering on the lake.
[All Photos By: Kidist P. Asrat]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Book Project: The Sturdy Periwinkle at the Cloisters: Linking the New World with the Old

I will develop this essay outline for the Nature chapter, under Gardens, or in Chapter Four's Culture and Society . Some of the information is at this blog post from February 2013 in Reclaiming Beauty.


The Trie Garden in the Cloisters
Discussed in: Garden Guide: New York City pp. 33-37
Cloisters Flowers
[Photo by Kidist P. Asrat, August 2012]


The Cloisters show the us the New World's medieval, European historical and cultural inheritance. Yet, although the Cloisters seem to take us that far back in time, the Hudson River below, and the George Washington Bridge in the distance soon brings us to the present, to New York and to the New World. In New York, we have a New World city that has a historical link going further back than medieval Europe to ancient Greece and Rome, as medieval Europe inherited its culture and history from ancient Greece and Rome. Thus, the history of New York, like the history of America, is tied to Antiquity, which is the root of Western civilization. Historians and anthropologists have tried to expand America's cultural and historical inheritance to cover the breadth of the world. "America," they tell us "is multicultural." By that they mean that since contemporary America appears to accommodate every race and culture of the world, then America is an amalgam of the world's histories and cultures: Chinese, Indian, African, Southern European, South American.

By virtue of having landed on her shores, anyone can become an American, bringing with him a piece of himself which becomes ingrained in this multicultural fabric. But nothing could be further than the truth.

The earliest arrivals, admittedly are the non-Europeans Indians, who crossed the span of the country securing some kind of territorial possession. Yet, we cannot allocate land to anyone who put up a post (and often temporary), and lived in dispersed and often warring communities. The Indians did not form a cohesive society or culture that could have built up the vast land the occupied in clumps of tribes, leaving vast spaces empty, uninhabited and uncultivated. That was the accomplishment of the later arrivals, the Europeans. The Bible tells us, and we should dutifully listen, that God rewards those who bring back more than they were give.
14 "For the kingdom of heaven is like a man traveling to a far country, who called his own servants and delivered his goods to them.

15 And to one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, to each according to his own ability; and immediately he went on a journey.

16 Then he who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and made another five talents.

17 And likewise he who had received two gained two more also.

18 But he who had received one went and dug in the ground, and hid his lord’s money.

19 After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them.

20 "So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, 'Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them.'

21 His lord said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.'

22 He also who had received two talents came and said, 'Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them.'

23 His lord said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.'

24 "Then he who had received the one talent came and said, 'Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed.

25 And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours.'

26 "But his lord answered and said to him, 'You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed.

27 So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest.

28 Therefore take the talent from him, and give it to him who has ten talents.

29 'For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away.

30 And cast the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'[Matthew 25: 14-30]
And how do we tackle the multiculturalists, who insist that America is for everyone? It is time that Western, European Americans claim their culture. John D. Rockefeller and George Grey Barnard brought back bricks from ancient castles in France to build the American Cloisters. They traveled to Europe to accumulated the treasures that fill up the museum.
Much of the sculpture at The Cloisters was acquired by George Grey Barnard (1863–1938), a prominent American sculptor and an avid collector of medieval art. Barnard opened his original cloisters on Fort Washington Avenue to the public in 1914; through the generosity of philanthropist and collector John D. Rockefeller, Jr. (1874–1960), the Museum acquired the cloisters and all of their contents in 1925. By 1927, it was clear that a new, larger building would be needed to display the collection in a more scholarly fashion. In addition to financing the conversion of 66.5 acres of land just north of Barnard’s museum into a public park, which would house the new museum, Rockefeller donated 700 additional acres across the Hudson River to the state of New Jersey to ensure that no developments on the property would spoil the view from The Cloisters. In addition to providing the grounds and building to house the Barnard collection, Rockefeller contributed works of art from his own collection—including the celebrated Unicorn Tapestries—and established an endowment for operations and future acquisitions [source: The Cloisters Museum and Gardens].
They made a concerted effort to make the American link an European one, and not Indian (native or continental), Chinese, African or South American. The non-Western's interest in America is not to build this American culture, but to try and leave his own cultural mark. But, that isn't working, since where-ever that happens, the result is destruction. There is no Chinese haute cuisine; there are no Indian cathedrals; there is no African classical art; there is no Mexican architecture. And these multiculturalists know this, since once at the shores of America, they immediately start delineating their boundaries: this is my Indian food, these are my Chinese children, here is my African holiday. Yet, they cannot ignore the beauty and the sophistication of the European culture, and in fact that is why they made the journies across oceans: to bask in the good life of handsome homes, abundant food, erudite teachers, and safe and civilized neighborhoods, many of the things they couldn't get (or get at a price) in the countries they left behind. And still, they insist on maintaining their old beliefs. Mostly because they wouldn't know what to do with the culture that awaits them, but also because their own cultures are like an old sweater which comfort them amidst all this alienness. Material comfort only goes so far. There are also spiritual and psychological comforts to appease.

Their existence is like the last servant in the parable who said: "And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground," and incurred the wrath of God. Their talent may work in their own lands, and they may indeed double it, but in this continent, they don't know what to do with it, and they let it waste. Their lack of productivity, over time, becomes destructive. Nothing new gets built, and what they live off is what came before them, which diminishes with time. That is where the anger of God came from, not just the wastefulness and laziness of the last servant, but also his lack of imagination and daring in creating less than what he was given.

As I was looking through my files and notes on the Cloisters, mainly to find an appropriate image for the front cover of my proposed book, I found the above photo I took of the garden. I was struck by a tiny flower, the periwinkle (also known as the myrtle).


Periwinkles in the Cloisters
Discussed in Garden Guide: New York City pp. 33-37
Periwinkle Label:
Common Periwinkle, Myrtle
Vinca minor
[Photo by Kidist P. Asrat, August 2012]


The periwinkle, which grows in the gardens of the New York, New World, Cloisters, originated in Europe, and was brought over to North America in the 1700s.
The Trie Cloister Garden is home to a collection of plants native to the meadows, woodlands, and stream banks of Europe. Planted as a single filed of herbs and flowers, the garden evokes the verdant grounds of medieval millefleurs tapestries, in which a myriad species are shown blooming simultaneously. Many of the plants gorwing in the garden can be found in the tapestries on display in the galleries, but they bloom here in their proper season.

The European flora is dominated by spring-blooming plants, and the garden is bright with blossoms in early spring, when hellebores, snowdrops, periwinkles, narcissus, violets, wild pansies and English daisies abound, followed by bluebells, columbine, dame's rocket, and iris in May. Foxglove, clary, meadowsweet and ox-eye daisies bloom well into summer. In July the flowering begins to subside, and the Trie becomes a green garden, in which plants chosen for their form and foliage predominate. Acanthus, royal fern, and flag provide a foil for the lesser number of summer-blooming flowers.

Small shrubs like myrtle and sweet gale give structure to the garden, and are repeated throughout to create a pleasing symmetry. In late summer, the cloister becomes a cool refuge, where the air is perfumed by the pots of poet's jasmine that line the parapets. Water splashes from the fountain at the center, and small birds come to drink from the spouts. [Notes from the information booklet]
In ancient Rome, Pliny wrote in The Natural History of Pliny:
Sprigs of myrtle, if carried by a person when travelling on foot, are found to be very refreshing, on a long journey.
- The information plaque by the periwinkle bed in the Cloisters describes the flower as a medieval cancer treatment:
Annual periwinkles have been used for centuries for folk medicine, especially for treating diabetes, and are the source of several cancer drugs.
- And from this site, on the meaning of the flower's name:
The Latin name of periwinkle's genus, Vinca, is derived from a word meaning "to overcome."
- In Christian symbolism, the periwinkle represents Gentiles converted to Christ.

Such a small flower, with such a sturdy name! And it embodies the spirit of the Western civilization in America: overcoming the odds to arrive on the continent from a distant Europe, and to survive and flourish in America; containing healing and life-prolonging properties; maintaining the spiritual and religious link; and whose presence and benefits are known since Antiquity.

This tiny flower is also featured in art, which the American inheritors have transplanted to their New World shores, in order to link them with their European heritage.


Window with Grisaille Decoration
Date: ca. 1325
Geography: Made in Rouen, France Culture: French
Medium: Pot metal glass, colorless glass, silver stain, and vitreous paint
Dimensions: Overall: 28 1/4 x 23 1/2 in.
The Cloisters Collection

In this fourteenth-century panel, the vibrant color and robust lines of thirteenth-century stained glass were jettisoned in favor of colorless glass painted with leafy vines growing on a trellis. The three foliate designs, each of which is remarkable for its delicacy and refinement, are identifiable not only by their botanical species but also as patterns known to have originated at Saint-Ouen. The two lower panels display the periwinkle flower; the third panel represents the leaf of the strawberry plant; and the top two depict geranium foliage. The colored borders incorporate buttercup leaves with red and green quarries, and the center bosses are composed of whorls of artemisia leaves entwined with knotted ribbons of color. [Notes from theMetropolitan Museum of Art]
The plant forms in this detail are too highly stylized to be botanically identified, with the exception of the grisaille flowering vine with silver stain blossoms. This may be tentatively identified as a species of periwinkle, either Vinca major or V. minor, but it is not a botanically accurate representation. Periwinkle flowers are blue, not yellow or gold, but form is more important in the identification of plants in medieval art than color. Even botanically recognizable plants are represented in color forms other than those found in nature. [Notes from theMetropolitan Museum of Art]

Detail of the top square panel of the grisaille window, with stylized yellow periwinkles, from
stained glass window in the Cloisters' Gothic Hall
The five panels of this lancet window once decorated three different windows in the radiating chapels of the abbey church of Saint-Ouen at Rouen, in Normandy. As reassembled here, the lancet is only one-third its original height. Grisaille glass, which is colorless and translucent, was a popular glazing device in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. It not only allows more light into the interior than color-saturated pot-metal glass, grisaille also functions as an unobtrusive background for ornamental motifs painted with fine brush lines. Our glass panels are decorated with stylized yet recognizable plants such as periwinkle, strawberry, and artemisia, forming an elegant network of foliate motifs. The central bosses of the panels are richly colored with deep blue, red, yellow, and green. The bosses would have echoed the brilliantly hued horizontal bands once located at the windows' midpoints, which contained scenes from the life of the saint to whom the chapel was dedicated.

The Early Gothic Hall, Closters
The Early Gothic Hall houses works from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The three thirteenth-century limestone windows overlooking the Hudson River are filled with Gothic stained-glass panels from the cathedrals of Canterbury, Rouen, Soissons, and other sites. Also on view are French, Spanish, and Italian sculptures of the period, as well as an altarpiece depicting the Adoration of the Shepherds painted by the Sienese artist Bartolo di Fredi about 1374. [Notes from the Metropolitan Museum of Art]
This surprising flower is an apt symbol for perseverance and persistence.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, April 8, 2013

Churchill: Protecting England


Churchill, aged 7
In Dublin, Ireland
Ministry of Information
WWII Misc. Collection
Cat. No. ZZZ 7555D


On April 5th, PBS showed a documentary on Churchill titled "Great Romances of the 20th Century: Clementine & Winston Churchill." I cannot find any video (even promotional video) on it, but this is how the program describes the documentary:
The story of an enduring love match between two intelligent and forceful personalities. Clementine gave great strength to Britain's great war leader and helped him to weather the storms of his changeable political career.
There is a lot we already know about Churchill, including his persistence in fighting Hitler, which the documentary outlined. But I didn't know that he introduced the term "The Iron Curtain" to the world. He did so in a speech in 1946 at Westminster College, in Fulton, Missouri where he came to receive an honorary degree. Here is part of his speech:
From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia, all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet sphere, and all are subject in one form or another, not only to Soviet influence but to a very high and, in some cases, increasing measure of control from Moscow. Athens alone -- Greece with its immortal glories -- is free to decide its future at an election under British, American and French observation. The Russian-dominated Polish Government has been encouraged to make enormous and wrongful inroads upon Germany, and mass expulsions of millions of Germans on a scale grievous and undreamed-of are now taking place. The Communist parties, which were very small in all these Eastern States of Europe, have been raised to pre-eminence and power far beyond their numbers and are seeking everywhere to obtain totalitarian control. Police governments are prevailing in nearly every case, and so far, except in Czechoslovakia, there is no true democracy.
A good part of the video showed Churchill's home, the beautiful Chartwell House. It was his paradisaical sanctuary, where he could work out his thoughts and ideas. "A day away from Chartwell is a day wasted," he said.


Winston Churchill
Arthur Pan (1894–1983)
Date Painted: 1943
Oil on canvas
40" x 50"



Chartwell grounds


A View of Chartwell
Winston Churchill
Date painted: c. 1938
Oil on canvas
23 3/4 x 36 in
Collection: National Trust



The Drawing room


The Library


The Study


Churchill's desk in his study


Close-up of Churchill's desk in the study, with busts of Napoleon,
and family photographs



The Studio, with oil and watercolor paintings by Churchill


Churchill painting


Lady Randolph Churchill (1854-1921)
(Churchill's mother)
Ernest Rinzi (British, 1836-1909)
Oval Miniature
81 in. high



Lord Randolph Churchill (1849-1895)
(Churchill's father)
Edwin Longsden Long (1829-1891)
Oil on canvas
Exhibited 1888
50 1/8 in. x 40 in.



Winston Churchill and his wife Clementine (who resembles his mother)


The Beach at Walmer
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Oil on canvas
25 x 30 in.
Date painted: c. 1938


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

In The Fen Country


Vaughn Williams
In The Fen Country
Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra
Conducted by Paul Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Fen Country:
Landscape and Music in the Work of Gustav Holst and Ralph Vaughan Williams

By: Thomas F. Bertonneau

Sensitivity to the landscape has always been associated with religious sensibility. In the decorative murals with which the wealthy classes of Rome during the Imperial centuries adorned their domestic lives, the idyllic scene, with its groves and grazing sheep, invariably contains a rustic temple. In Hellenistic poetry, too, the writer – it might be Theocritus or at a later date Ovid – in describing the sylvan setting of Sicily or Arcadia emphasizes the presence everywhere of the nature-spirits. Ovid’s Metamorphoses seem in part to be an explanation of why everywhere in the ancient world one encountered innumerable altars and shrines. To the pagan mentality, everything, every tree and stream and mountain, was sacred, a home to spirits and demigods. So too in romantic painting and verse, the artist’s response to the natural scene is essentially religious and pantheistic. Thus in William Wordsworth’s famous sonnet “The world is too much with us” (1802), the calamity of the emergent industrial and commercial order manifests itself most poignantly in the terrible loneliness of being cut off from participation in the sacredness of the elements –

The world is too much with us; late and soon,
Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers;
Little we see in Nature that is ours;
We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!

The lyric subject of the poem, concluding that the modern dispensation has left men “for everything… out of tune,” wishes that he were (although he is not) “a Pagan suckled in a creed outworn,” that is, someone who might “have glimpses that would make me less forlorn” of “Proteus rising from the sea.” That men should have become acutely aware of nature in the early nineteenth century is hardly surprising. The social and economic developments of the period, the hypertrophy of cities and the dissolution of ancient arrangements in the countryside, wrought changes in the very appearance of the rural landscape. A generation later than Wordsworth, in the “Wessex” stories and novels of Thomas Hardy, the situation has grown even more acute. In the short story “The Fiddler of the Reels,” the great fact of existence is the Crystal Palace, in the year of whose construction much of the action takes place. The countryside is emptying into the great cities; railroads have appeared in the provinces, and the landscape itself is being altered by the expansion of a new order.

Art is frequently a response to loss and the resultant absence, as generically in lyric poetry. The elegiac impulse finds one of its most profound expressions in the response to landscape – often to vanishing landscape – in the work of what is sometimes called the English Pastoral School of musical composition, the heyday of which was the early twentieth century. The two instigators of English musical idyllicism, Ralph Vaughan Williams (1872 – 1958) and Gustav Holst (1874 – 1934), had been fellow students at the Royal College of Music, London, in the 1890s, where both studied composition with Charles Villiers Stanford. Both men experienced the powerful intuition that Stanford, notwithstanding his technical mastery, spoke in a musical language insufficiently native, and, in a paradoxical way, insufficiently au courant. Stanford took his models in mid-nineteenth century German music – in Mendelssohn, Schumann, and Brahms – and except for an occasional Irish inflection, his music sounded a good deal like theirs. But what musical language would be au courant? Holst, who came from a long line of church organists and musicians, suggested to Vaughan Williams that they investigate the music of the rural parishes and from that milieu their curiosity took them quite naturally into folksong. As did Bela Bartók in Hungary and Romania around the same time, Vaughan Williams and Holst began to tramp the countryside in Somerset, Hampshire, Essex, East Anglia, and Norfolk, notebooks at ready, to collect and annotate the archaic song-tradition that they well knew was on the verge of extinction. These were the years from 1902 to 1905. In addition to their project of preserving the treasury of the traditional ballads, love songs, and lullabies, both men had the notion that English folksong could become the basis of a novel and truly English concert music. That music would be new because its basis would be more ancient than that of the Germanic conservatory-vocabulary employed by Stanford and his peers.

There was one additional consideration – or rather a conclusion that both Vaughan Williams and Holst drew independently and that struck them as exploitable. The modes and melodic outlines of English folksong reflected the regional landscape; the tunes especially grew from the topography. As in Wordsworth’s lyrical ballad “The Solitary Reaper,” where the singing field-girl’s half-heard song seems to the reporter to express the “natural sorrow, loss, or pain,” that belongs to traditional life, in contact with the earth and season and sky: so too for the fellow folksong collectors, the tunes that they took down from those who sang them seemed saturated with an ethos – a character of place that imprinted itself on its denizens and that they bespoke in song. As Vaughan Williams wrote many years later in his study of National Music (1934), folksong is the expression of “the absolutely unsophisticated though naturally musical man… one who is untraveled and therefore self-dependent for his inspiration [and] whose artistic utterance will be entirely spontaneous and unself-conscious.” Or as Hubert Foss writes of Vaughan Williams himself in his study of the composer, he “grows from the earth”; according to Foss, Vaughan Williams “likes that which grows naturally” and “his roots are in the past.” Of Holst, Wilfrid Mellers writes in Romanticism and the Twentieth Century (1962), that folksong studies taught him how to compose “in lines that are vocally modal [and] free in rhythm,” so that even his purely instrumental inspirations resemble “folk-song or plainsong” in their melodic outlines.

Folksong early began to inform and vitalize Vaughan Williams’ music, which it does already in the “symphonic impression,” so described, for orchestra entitled In the Fen Country, composed in 1904 and given its first performance under Thomas Beecham in 1907. In the Fen Country, in many ways RVW’s first characteristic work, purports to represent its composer’s complex aesthetic, emotional, and spiritual response to the extensive southeastern marshlands of England – that half-aqueous world, with its dykes and canals, and its university and cathedral towns of Cambridge and Ely. As Foss puts it in his study, in the Fen Country “gives… a picture of the countryside where Vaughan Williams found folk-song,” adding that, “those frigid, frosty mornings that make the journey from Cambridge to Ely so soul-searching a trek are portrayed here.” Yet In the Fen Country quotes no folk melody. Rather, Vaughan Williams lets the pattern of folk melody animate his rhythmically free, generally slow, and modally minor instrumental lines. The work, lasting around a quarter of an hour in performance, opens with a long improvisatory sounding solo on the cor anglais, joined gradually in a freely evolving polyphony by other solo instruments. Although the motifs are songlike, the effect on the listener is rather of something non-human – “the place in itself,” perhaps. After a number of episodes, some quite portentous and brassy, In the Fen Country ends on a drawn-out viola solo that fades into silence.

Holst composed his Somerset Rhapsody, Op. 21, in 1906. Unlike Vaughan Williams’ In the Fen Country, Holst’s Somerset Rhapsody incorporates actual folksongs, including a traditional sheep shearing song, whose real topic despite its title is the custom of countryside courtship, and a march, “High Germany.” The sheep shearing song keeps in the minor-key and suggests the melancholy of the lovelorn; the march is in the major-key, outgoing, rhythmically incisive, and bold. Holst exploits the contrast and drives the work to its big moment with a brassy treatment of the march, in augmentation. A Somerset Rhapsody conjures a more human atmosphere than does In the Fen Country although in its quieter concluding passages after the climax on “High Germany,” Holst’s score strongly resembles Vaughan Williams’ score. Vaughan Williams composed his own version of the sheep shearing song, for female voices and chamber-orchestral accompaniment, assigning it to his suite Folksongs of the Four Seasons (1950). The tune “High Germany” makes an appearance in Vaughan Williams’ English Folk Song Suite, for wind band (1923).

Concerning landscape – and its aesthetic and metaphysical meanings – the philosopher Roger Scruton has written in his study of Beauty (2009) that, “Landscapes… are very far from works of art – they owe their appeal not to symmetry, unity and form, but to an openness, grandeur and world-like expansiveness, in which it is we and not they that are contained.” In confronting the landscape then the percipient subject experiences something like a cosmic moment, understanding his own mortal limitations against the enduring earthly and vegetative environment that afford him a home and yet, being non-sentient, remains alien or at least indifferent to him. Yet vegetative though it might be, the landscape can stand as metaphor for something else sublime and, with respect to man, entirely prior and creative – namely the divine. In this respect it is interest to reflect that neither Vaughan Williams nor Holst was conventionally religious. Vaughan Williams professed agnosticism but also took religious experience seriously; Holst inclined to thoroughgoing ecumenicism, showing an interest in mystic Christianity, Hinduism, and the whole range of esoteric traditions.

In the years 1906 – 07, Vaughan Williams composed his Three Norfolk Rhapsodies, fragments of a projected but unachieved “Norfolk Symphony.” The Third Rhapsody is lost; the Second was never played in its composer’s lifetime, while the First established itself among RVW’s early work. In these works, following Holst’s manner in A Somerset Rhapsody, Vaughan Williams used actual folk melodies. In the Norfolk Rhapsody No. 1, for example, we hear “The Captain's Apprentice,” “A Bold Young Sailor Courted Me,” and “On Board a 98.” In the Norfolk Rhapsody No. 2, we hear, among others, the hymn-like “King’s Lynn,” sometimes sung as a chapel song. As was the case with In the Fen Country, the two Norfolk Rhapsodies, in exploiting the modally flavored folksongs, require a largely minor-key harmonics, saturating the musical structure in a mood of nostalgia. Knowing that John Constable (1776 – 1837) and Albert Goodwin (1845 – 1932) painted the regions from which RVW collected his tunes adds to the listener’s appreciation of the spirit that the composer evokes through his purely musical structures. Foss describes the First Rhapsody, the only one known when he wrote his study, as “a deeply considered work… a moving piece of music that never rises above piano, and closes in the sea of mist of [its] beginning.”

Vaughan Williams wrote his best-known score, A Lark Ascending, in 1914, when he scored it for violin and piano; later in 1920 he arranged the piano part for small ensemble, giving the score its familiar form, as a “Romance for Violin and Orchestra.” Taking its inspiration from a poem of the same name by George Meredith (1828 – 1909), A Lark Ascending has acquired something like iconic status in English music, as the prime representative piece of the national-pastoral school, such that many people who know little else from that repertory know this gentle composition. Foss remarks that the two main melodies of the score “are coloured by English folk-song.” The solo violin part is nearly pictorial in its depiction of the avian ascent, its long cadenza-like passages being interrupted by episodes in dance rhythm. If the rustic piping heard halfway through the score were close in its archaism to Pre-Raphaelite preciosity, this would perhaps be the result of the listener having heard the work too often. The “sheer beauty” of A Lark, to borrow a phrase from Foss, should be reserved for special occasions. Overplaying the composition threatens to deaden us to its delicate gestures and ecstatic sweetness.

Holst’s Egdon Heath and Vaughan Williams’ Flos Campi date from the mid-1920s. Holst’s inspiration came from a Hardy novel, The Return of the Native (1878), one of the author’s “Wessex Tales,” in which the eponymous geographical tract rises to the level of a character in the drama. Hardy describes Egdon Heath in something like antediluvian terms, as swarthy, forbidding, and almost actively inimical to the human beings who must cross it going from one habitable place to another. In Holst’s tone-poem (1927), one of his masterpieces, the composer eschews any quotation of traditional melody and confines himself to pure tone-painting, evoking in sound the emotions that Hardy’s verbal description produces in its reader. This means that in mood Egdon Heath stands light-years distant from A Somerset Rhapsody. A slow, stalking figure in the double basses establishes the atmosphere; a quiet horn call, as from far away, and spare counterpoint in the flutes and oboes, followed by a fugitive rustling in the violins and violas, make for an impression of ghostly, nocturnal activity. Halfway through the score, there is something like a funeral cortege, colored by the trombones and tuba in their lowest registers. That these sounds tell of a tragic vision, the score’s association with Hardy’s grim narrative guarantees even though listeners can assign no specific concepts to the various stark motifs.

Flos Campi – Suite for Viola, Chorus, and Orchestra (1925), which like Egdon Heath quotes no actual folk songs, is not topically connected with the English countryside although its Latin title means “Flower of the Field.” The suite’s ostensible subject, the Biblical Song of Songs, celebrates that psychological point where erotic passion for the beloved passes over into mystic contemplation of absolute beauty. Nevertheless, Flos Campi will strike the reader as the consummation of that trend in RVW’s creativity, which begins with In the Fen Country; the music seems to spring from the identical, and quite English, landscape, the Biblical allusion notwithstanding. Professor Mellers in his book on RVW The Vision of Albion (1989) places Flos Campi in company with a group of large-scale choral and vocal works that its author composed around the same time – including his setting of The Magnificat (1932). Mellers identifies the solo viola with “the voice of Pan, or Nature, or of human lover and beloved, or he might be… all of these simultaneously.” Mellers also identifies the oboe, almost as important as the viola in its part, as specifically in context “a pastoral instrument.” In the last of the work’s six movements, according to Mellers, “Man and Nature… attain at-one-ment,” if only temporarily. Foss too lavishes praise on Flos Campi, calling it “one of [RVW’s] most original, and most important, expressions,” and praising its “lone philosophic attitude of thought.” The device of a wordless chorus has rarely been employed so convincingly, not even by Maurice Ravel in his Daphnis and Chloe ballet.

Vaughan Williams wrote Five Variants in Dives and Lazarus for string orchestra and harp in 1939, to be played at the World Fair in New York City. In this score the composer once again draws on an actual folk tune, “Dives and Lazarus.” As in the case of Flos Campi, although RVW does not proffer the score as a musical landscape that is nevertheless its feeling.

In the last year of his life Holst produced a small but potent work that belongs to the “landscape” genre – his Lyric Movement for Viola and Chamber Orchestra (1934), a work smaller in scale yet close in mood and intention to Flos Campi. To his soloist, Holst gives the same type of improvisatory and continuously developing line as RVW his in Flos Campi, and the same yearning for fusion with the object of contemplation flavors both scores. Mellers in Romanticism and the Twentieth Century writes of its “tenderness in the sonorous spacing of the harmony.” One might justly attribute to the Lyric Movement what Mellers attributes to Egdon Heath – that in it the personality of the composer is “purged away in the bare organum-like harmony and transparent scoring.” Was this brief sketch supposed to be the slow middle movement of a three-part concerted work? Nevertheless, it achieves stand-alone perfection. Holst died before his sixtieth birthday. In listening to the Lyric Movement, one can only regret that a composer capable of such concentrated expression did not live to explore the remarkable new avenues of musical exploration that he was, in that moment, opening up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat