Showing posts with label Gender. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender. Show all posts

Friday, February 21, 2014

Young and Lesbian: An Epidemiology?


Photo from article: "Why Are So Many Girls Lesbian or Bisexual?"
From: Psychology Today, April 3, 2010
By: Leonard Sax, M.D., Ph.D.
These look just like the "college best friends" I write about below


Camille Paglia would be intrigued, and horrified, at this epidemiology of young lesbians, cheerfully "coming out."

Ellen Page

A few days ago, a young and pretty Canadian actress, Ellen Page, declared herself to be a closeted lesbian, that is until that moment when she dramatically announced to whomever bothered to listen: I am gay. She's twenty-six years old at this announcement, but according to her testimony, had been "gay" for years.

I found her video on New York Post's online magazine. It was hard to miss on the side column, with a large photo of her, and the headline: Tired of Hiding: Actress Ellen Page Comes Out as Gay.

Page is claiming that her "coming out" is "a personal obligation and a social responsibility [direct quote from the Youtube video here around the 6:15 minute point]", and is otherwise a "traumatic event."

It is interesting to see that "coming out" in the 21st century is such a traumatic event. I thought we had taken care of stigmatizing gays and had built such a "gay-friendly" world that people were declaring their "true selves" left and right.

Well, not so, apparently. Page tearfully declares: "I suffered for years because I was scared to be 'out'." Didn't Ellen DeGeneres, pernicious model for this young Ellen, present us with her "secret" in a similarly tearful declaration seventeen years ago? Her career hasn't diminished one bit, and in fact has climbed since then.


Page with "girlfriend"

Page was brought up in Eastern Canada, in Nova Scotia. Her parents divorced when she was very young, and her father remarried. She lived with her mother. At about fifteen, Page enrolled herself into a "Buddhist" school, with no academic structure, which emphasized "the arts." And her parents let her do this! Divorce is hard on any child, but a structureless one must be harsh. And worse, letting a young teenager decide on her intellectual and spiritual development is bizarre and cruel.


This is the best I could find of Page with her father.
Notice the impish quality of the father, who looks like he's out with his young son.
But then, what young boy would cling to his father like that?
Such is the ambiguous world of tomboys.



Page with her mother, looking dishevelled and tomboyish.
It looks like they were both out at some film premier,
where Page should be the star, but is upstaged
by her glamorous mother instead.


But homosexuality is still a social stigma, if "celebrities" have to make such a spectacle about their revelations. Normal, ordinary people, those that pay the films and shows to keep DeGeneres and Page in the business, will momentarily forget a gay person his abnormality as long as he entertains well. And if homosexuality is still a social stigma, despite all these efforts to normalize it, then it will always remain a social stigma.

And just in time for Obama's homosexual agenda of equality, the PBS program To The Contrary "for women, by women, about women" (my quotations), recently included on its panel an articulate black women, Danielle Moodie-Mills. I wondered who she was, with her caked make-up and twisted stringy hair.


Moodie on the PBS program To The Contrary, which aired a couple of weeks ago

I found her profile all over the internet, since then. She is a black lesbian, whose "marriage" to another black woman was profiled in the black magazine Essence. They "married" in 2010, Mills at 32 and Moodie 31, and had "been together" for six years before that, which means they started this "relationship" when they were in their early twenties.


Danielle Moodie, on the right, is:
Advisor, LGBT Policy and Racial Justice
Center for American Progress
Nonprofit; 201-500 employees; Think Tanks industry
(LinkedIn Profile)

and Ayisha Millis is:
...a Senior Fellow and Director of the FIRE - Fighting Injustice to Reach Equality - Initiative at the Center for American Progress, where her work explores the intersections of race, class, and sexuality.
(Center for American Progress profile)


They both have those fluffy jobs just right for the Obama administration.

There must be dozens around of these "lesbians" around. Girls walking around the mall, chattering and laughing: are they "young lesbians"? Two young women eating in a restaurant, fancily dressed: are they on a date? A couple, women, picking up a young child at school or at a day care: are they "two mommies"? And so on.

I won't go into the pshychological, sociological, cultural, School of Camille Paglia, analyses of what I'm seeing here, so here's my take, at least on Page, Moodie and Mills.

There is very little information forthcoming from Moodie or Mills. I've gleaned what there is available from various websites and their limited profiles in their professional biographies.

Danielle Moodie

Danielle Moodie's only reference to her parentage (from searches around the web) is a photo of hers which appeared on Essence magazine's profile of her "marriage" to Mills. Here, she is standing with a white man, named as Michael Newton, with the caption:
Dance with my father:
Danielle’s dad Michael Newton was close to tears as he danced with his daughter on her momentous day.
Below is the photograph:


(Source: Essence)

I can only assume that she is adopted. Where is the mother (adoptee)? Why isn't she included in this wedding photograph? Is she white, black, other? What kind of life does Moodie live where she has to call a white man as her father? How hard was this for her as a young girl (assuming she was adopted young)? How much harder did it get as she became conscious of her surroundings? How did the "black identity" culture affect her identity? How does she relate to whites, and to the ominous White Male?

Aisha Mills


Mills posted this photo collage on her Twitter page

Mills was raised by her grandmother. She says: "My entire life, I have been a variety of 'others'." According to this post, her mother had "Asian" roots, but she was raised by her Black Southern Baptist grandparents, as the photos above indicate. The young, light-skinned boy in the photo collage could be her brother. Or is it her dressed in a suit and tie (as a young boy)? Yes! It is her, dressed as a young boy! So there you have it.

And here below, she is with her MIU (Missing in Upbringing) father at her "wedding."


Source: Essence
Caption reads:
Proud Father
Aisha's father James Mills kisses his baby girl and wishes her well on her big day

The Mills-Moodie "elegant affair" of a wedding included baskets of chopsticks. The ominous absence of her Asian mother must make even the most mundane of Chinese objects into bouquets of roses.


Chopstick elegance: Reaching for some ephemeral roots
Chopsticks, from the wedding album by Essence
The caption reads:
Cocktail Hour:
"The entire wedding was an elegant cocktail affair," Aisha explained.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what is it with these young women?

- A chaotic home life?
- A dearth of masculine young men?
- Feminism pushing young women into competitive and masculine roles, where they clash with young men, both the feminized ones, and those standing their ground and refusing to give in easily to a woman-centric environment?
- Black men, unavailable, either through their dropping out of society, their criminality, or their immaturity?
- Men refusing marriage, for fear of repercussions by feminism, and feminist women and wives?
- Men refusing to mature, and instead delaying marriage and family?
- The culture pushing, through mass media, that marriage is not necessary?
- Divorce rates, and divorce costs, high, especially (uniquely?) for men, so many opting out of marriage?
The "otherness" of the other becoming too much to deal with for young people these days, who are not used to natural competitions, and eventually some awe for differences.
- The desire by contemporary people to make everyone the same, to avoid this natural alienness or otherness of people?
- The desire to make everything "nice" and non-combative?

In any case, this "best friend" type of coupling is well suited for girls in college and high school. Under normal conditions, these girls will find staunch mothers or grandmothers who will diminish that seductive environment, give them the education they need, and place them in situations where they can lead a normal life, including building their future families.

The women I've described above are traumatized orphans, both in society and in family. They have been dealt with difficult beginnings. Since their families didn't come through for them, then it should have been up to the larger society to see that they didn't normalize their ambiguities and abnormalities. Now, as adults, they are seeped in their iniquities, and will only further terrorize society. Our job now is to see that they don't do that, and that they don't amass more vulnerable innocents along their way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, December 2, 2013

Mutli-Culti Girl Riveters Building Amunition?










Laura Wood, at The Thinking Housewife has posted the above image, which was sent by one of her correspondents. It is a crew of multi-culti future girl engineers. On closer inspection, what these girls are really interested in are the pinkness of their toy kitchen cabinets. The full interaction about girls (and women) in men-oriented fields like engineering, is discussed at the site.

What I'm interested in is the expressions of these little girls.

I kind of like the black girl's "come and get me if you want trouble" expression, in the group photo I posted above. I think black girls, and low-income black girls in particular, are at the bottom of the totem pole of American life. I think they have it tough. Being on welfare, as many are, is a mind-numbing life. And as the statistics show, they are single mothers on welfare: i.e their men have abandoned them. So I think this aggressive stance is a form of self-protection, even against those men who may show up for whatever opportunistic reason. Does that translate into the tough job of a construction worker though? I doubt it. Manouevering welfare to bring up a baby is very different from wheeling huge machinery around and planning the construction of a building.

But, then look at the black girl when she smiles. What a pretty face, in a strong and chiseled way, she has. Her behavior seems spontaneous and genuine. She really is smiling. And is happy to smile. I suspect that when she gets mad, it is with equal genuineness.

Next, the Asian girl. She seems the most out of place. She cannot act "tough" following the black girl's lead, and instead looks self-conscious, doing an uncomfortable parody of "tough." What happens when a rough, aggressive working man questions her authority? No smile, or half smile, will work.

And she smiles (or half-smiles) as though she doesn't know how to read the cues for "it is o.k. to smile now." Danger seems to be around the corner.

The white girl has mimicked the black girl the closest. She does look serious and angry. I suspect she could wreck her own little havoc if she had to.

But then her expression later in the video loses that boldness. Not only has she lost her boldness, she seems to be asking, pleading, for help from some higher power. Can she not act tough on her own? Does she need the guidance of her black mentor (or some other mentor - probably a male)? Her toughness seems to fall apart pretty easily.

These girls may be wearing construction helmets, but they show us that they just want to be happy, pretty girls, surrounded by pinks and lavenders. Each in her own way, seems to buckle into being the kind of girl she knows how to be.

In terms of running the world, I would give the white girl a longer piece of the rope. And I would prefer the honesty of the black girl (think if Mammy in Gone with the Wind, who loved and took care of Tara and taught her right from wrong) to the hard-drives of an Asian girl (think of the Tiger Mom, who cannot seem to push - force - even her own children to the level she expects them to reach).

Now, the next experiment would be how this multi-culti assortment of female engineers would really fare in the real world. Would the black woman listen to the Asian? Would the white woman diplomatically lead the group? Would the firm build any bridges while making money? So far, the evidence is negative.


Rosie the Riveter: I Can Do It!

I got the title for this post from Rosie the Riveter. She was the iconic image for women working in factories building war machinery towards the war effort during WWII. The "We Can Do It!" Rosie the Riveter poster was created by J. Howard Miller for the War Production Coordinating Committee of the Westinghouse Company, in 1942.

I used Rosie's image and changed it to look like a black and an Asian woman to parody "inclusive" feminism that contemporary feminists advocate.



But, the reality is that even feminism cannot unite the different races of women. Even if the language is a war against a "common" enemy: Men.

Rosie (and the Rosies) went back to their domestic domains once the men came back from the war fronts.

And all little girls want are pretty, soft toys in pinks and lavenders.


Title: I'm proud ... my husband wants me to do my part
See your U.S. Employment Service / / John Newton Howitt.
Creator(s): Howitt, John Newton, 1885-1958, artist
Related Names:
United States. War Manpower Commission , funder/sponsor
United States. Office of War Information , funder/sponsor
Date Created/Published: [Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944.
Medium: 1 photomechanical print (poster) : halftone, color.
Summary: Husband, in suit, and wife in working clothes, standing in front of U.S. flag.
Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Sweet Scandinavian Girls Under the Influence: Part 2


Vivian Layno Jensen, Marie Mamen and Cana Elgvin
Norwegian Girls Conscripted into the Army


I wrote about the multicultural invasion in Norway in Sweet Scandinavian Girls Under the Influence. I was responding to a post Mark Richardson at Oz Conservative had written: Norway introduces conscription for women. After some investigation, I surmised:
My assessment is that Vivian Layno Jensen is half-Philipino, half Norwegian, if not full Philipino.
Here is what a reader of Mark's post says about the photo Mark had posted along with his article:
Why is there an Asian girl in the photo!

AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sweet Scandinavian Girls Under the Influence

A Viking objects to Oz Conservative Mark Richardson's post on female conscription in Norway with:
We have lost brave women in combat in Afghanistan. And you ramble about the size of a girl's forearms?
And Mark responds with this post: A Viking objects.

In the post which the Viking disliked, Norway introduces conscription for women, Mark wrote:
...Norway has become the first European country to begin conscripting women into its army. The new policy was supported on both the left and the right.

The thinking behind the policy was put simply enough by one of the young women who is liable to be called up. Cana Elgvin said "I think it is natural that in an equal society girls and boys have the same duties."
Mark comments on this photo, which he has posted on his site, and continues:


Vivian Layno Jensen, Marie Mamen and Cana Elgvin
That attitude casually assumes that men and women are made the same way for the same purposes. I think Cana herself is living proof that this assumption is wrong. Cana is the 17-year-old Norwegian girl on the right of the photo below. Was she really made for aggressive physical combat? For the physical rigours of combat? Look at how slender her forearms are. Could she really lug around a heavy weapon with those arms? Is she equipped with hard chest muscle and muscular limbs? And does she look like she has the emotional hardness and the aggressiveness to stand up for herself in a bayonet fight? And should she, as a woman, be expected to be hard in this way? Would that be the highest realisation of her feminine being?
But then look at the girl on the left, who is identified as Vivian Layno Jensen in this Norwegian news site. Doesn't she look, despite her short height, that she could withstand the rigors of combat, with her stocky build, thick body, strong bones, and confident expression?

Layno Jensen may yet enter the army, but meanwhile, the two meek-looking Scandinavian girls, Marie Mamen and Cana Elgvin, are no match for her. Like with all things in current immigration, native populations of whites are readily succumbing to strong-willed, non-white members of Western society, who are taking aggressive initiatives that cause harm to the countries they live in. We know about the Muslim aggression, which is at least straightforward: to kill for Allah. But how can we discern the Vivians?

The two Scandinavian natives, Marie Mamen and Cana Elgvin, who are meekly following behind Vivian, would protest war because they think no-one should die at war, including Vivian. But, Vivian would most likely retort that whites are killing off non-whites, who have to protect themselves against the evil whites, and therefore are entitled to "fight" however they see fit, even by exploding bombs in buses and schools. How shocked Marie and Cana would be to realize their "close" friend Vivian probably thinks like this, and is not some radical Muslim immigrant living so far away in those closed-off ghettos in the outskirts of their cities.

Unlike Mark, I would have separated Vivian from the trio, and written:
Given the betrayal by non-white members of Western societies (look at what happened in England recently), can Australians really trust non-white young women (and men) to fight for Queen and Country (as Australia is still part of the British Commonwealth)?
Of course, Mark's point is that no woman should be conscripted into the army. Yet, what happens when one allows people, men or women, who have no cultural, ethnic, historical, or even a sliver of patriotic ties to a country into the army? How can we be sure that they will defend a country to their last breath? How can we trust the ultimate fate of a country (war is as far into an ultimatum as we can get) to people whose loyalty we can never be sure of?

Below I describe how Vivian Layno Jensen is proving my point.

I tried to find out more about Vivian Layno Jensen. Here is what looks like her twitter page, it is partly in English, partly in Norwegian, and some in a Philipino language. She peppers her comments with information about the Philippines such as:
Vivian Layno Jensen ‏@ViviJens 4 Aug
@chloeblatter which one? Filipino 60y bday?
And has E. Aldrin S. Angulo as her twitter "friend."
6:31 AM - 4 Aug 12
E. Aldrin S. Angulo ‏@AldrinAngulo 4 Aug
@ViviJens @chloeblatter lol mamma og pappa skal dit :P
Looking up E. Aldrin S. Angulo's profile here, he's most likely of Philipino background, with his Spanish names.

The image below shows the photo Layno Jensen posted on Instagram (her Instagram profile reads: Vivian Jensen WHATTUP! DREAMTEAM Twitter:vivijens Oslo, Norway), with the caption, "One heck of a family day" which looks like her sprawling, Asian, family:



And here is a photo from a collage at her twitter pictures page twicsy, who look like they could be her Asian parents or grandparents:



And from her twicsy page, with a blonde-haired, blue-eyed friend, who looks like a typical Norwegian:



And this looks like the blonde friend. (The twicsy video is really disturbing, with an animalistic sound emitting from this pretty blonde, as she flicks her long blonde hair around and writhes on her bed. This is what she has up for the world to see.)

And finally, I typed in the name layno name philippines in Google Search, and these are some of the links that came up:
- Belen Layno - Philippines | LinkedIn
- Amado Layno, MD Profile | The Filipino Doctor
- Danielle Layno Philippines flew to the United States and
took part in the 2012 Miss Universe pageant

And so on.

My assessment is that Vivian Layno Jensen is half-Philipino, half Norwegian, if not full Philipino.

Can Marie and Cana ever see Vivian for what she is? Vivian most likely has no illusions about them, and knows where she stands. Will these two sweet-looking girls ever learn to fight? But they're going to have to, and quickly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------